In the case file, there are two lease agreements. Between the plaintiff and M. A. dated 9.10.2006 for 3 years, starting on 9.10.2006, for a monthly rent of 600 YTL and dated 10.10.2006 for 1 year, for a monthly rent of 175 YTL, and T. A. is a joint chain surety and debtor in these agreements.
It is not a matter of dispute that the signatures on the agreements belong to the parties. It is also understood that the contract. Dated 10.10.2006, which was submitted. By the defendant and subsequently issued. Was submitted to the tax office. In this case, it is understood. That the later-issued low-value contract. Was issued for submission to the tax office and is collusive. While the dispute should. Be resolved in accordance with the lease agreement dated 9.10.2006 and with a term of 3 years presented. By the plaintiff, which was organised in accordance with the real will of the parties. It was not deemed correct to establish a judgement. By valuing the agreement presented. By the defendant on written grounds, and the judgement. Should be reversed for this reason (Court of Cassation 6th HD – Decision: 2009/4503).
You can access our other article examples and petition examples by clicking