INDEMNITY CASE – IN THE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT, THE SUPPORT WAS SIX-EIGHTHS AND THE OTHER DRIVER WAS TWO-EIGHTHS AT FAULT – THERE WAS NO GROSS NEGLIGENCE – IT IS NECESSARY TO ACCEPT THAT THE PLAINTIFF CAN CLAIM SUPPORT INDEMNITY FROM THE COMPULSORY FINANCIAL LIABILITY INSURER OF THE SUPPORT VEHICLE
SUMMARY: In the traffic accident resulting in the death of the support, the support is 6/8 at fault and there is no severe fault. The driver of the other vehicle involved in the accident is 2/8 at fault. As a result of the General Assembly of Civil Chambers, it should be accepted that the plaintiff party, who filed the present lawsuit as a third party, may request support compensation from the compulsory financial liability insurer of the vehicle driven by their support, who was partially at fault in the traffic accident. Therefore, it should be accepted that the decision of resistance is appropriate…
You can access our other article examples and petition examples by clicking