The lawsuit was filed by the plaintiff. For the compensation of 70.000,00 TL damage allegedly. Suffered by the claimant alleging that the administration. Was responsible for depriving the plaintiff of his inheritance. Share by issuing a false report for the plaintiff’s father.
Adana 2nd Administrative Court; It should be accepted. That the date of learning of the health report. Which allegedly caused the damage allegedly suffered. Was 12.02.2013, therefore. The plaintiff, in accordance. With Article 12 of the İYUK, by not filing a lawsuit. Within the 60-day period of filing a lawsuit. Within the 60-day period of filing a lawsuit starting from. The date of learning or by not applying within the scope of Article 11. It was decided to dismiss.
The lawsuit due to out of time on the grounds. That it was not possible to examine the merits. Of the lawsuit filed on 24.10.2013 after this period. Was passed by not applying within the scope of Article 11, and no relative. Attorney fee was awarded against the plaintiff. Considering that the compensation case subject. To the dispute was dismissed. By the Court due to the statute of limitations and no decision.
Was made on the merits of the case. It was not in compliance. With the law to award an attorney’s fee according to the third part of the Tariff. Which directly stipulates the proportional fee tariff. While the attorney’s fee should not exceed. The fixed fee tariff stipulated in the second part of the second part of the Tariff. It has been decided to APPROVE the part of the full judgement. Case regarding the rejection of the full judgement case in terms of timeout, and to DISMISS the part regarding. The award of proportional attorney’s fee (15th Chamber of the Council of State – Decision: 2015/50459.
You can access our other article examples and petition examples by clicking