3. Criminal Department 2016/15735 E. , 2017/8207 K.
“Text Of Jurisprudence”
COURT : Criminal Court of First Instance
VERDICT : Acquittal
The decision given by the local court is appealed and the documents are read;
It was discussed and considered as necessary:
On the date of the accused’s incident … at the district gendarmerie command J.Er he served as an expert in the district gendarmerie command.J.II.Kad.CVS. Cook event in the history of the district gendarmerie command of the witness responsible for the mess …’s prepared dinner while the officer on duty on the day of the incident the victim …’s the purpose of giving food in a bowl with yoghurt filling and put it on the table while his back is turned by the defendant …’s used in Windows, its brand-name drugs taken while mixing bowl Cook …’s thinking but noticed that windows, threw salt in a bowl and drained the yoghurt pot and the defendant could use something other than a dinner plate a plate of policemen no table d’hote, according to the report dated 28/06/2013, which came from the Izmir Forensic Medical Institution on the blood samples of the client, 57.0 ng /ml of blood was found in the examination conducted by the Izmir Forensic Medical Institution, which he said that only the petty officers on duty could eat with a bowl, then the client also drank the medicated cacik in question, feeling sluggish and went into drowsiness syndrome, the defendant committed the act of throwing the food bowl used by only the sentry petty officer into the food bowl of his own use only to put the sentry petty officer to sleep during his shift at 03:00-06:00 on the night of the incident, and the witness saw the cook … empty the bowl into a glass pot, but it was fixed that he committed the crime of intentionally injuring the horse without making any noise, but instead of his conviction, he was mistaken in the discretion of the evidence decision of the acquittal in writing on the grounds,
Since the appeals of the Public prosecutor of that place were considered in place as of this moment, the decision was therefore made in accordance with Article 33 of Law No. 6723. article 321 of CMUK No. 1412, which is in force with Article 8/1 of Law No. 5320 amended by article. according to the article, it was decided unanimously on 07/06/2017 to DISRUPT it as requested.
You can read our other articles and petition examples by clicking here