19. Criminal Department 2016/376 E. , 2016/20120 K.
“Text Of Jurisprudence”
No. 2918 Highway Traffic Act 30/1-B substance act blameworthy for acts in violation of an administrative fine of about 189,00 Turkish Liras Authority held by the Bureau of registration and inspection of the implementation of the traffic administrative penalty numbered, dated as of 11/04/2015 and HF 4553 minutes …the decision regarding the denial of the application …The case file attached to the article containing the request of the Ministry of Justice to overturn the decision of the Magistrate dated 24/04/2015 and numbered 2015/45 on different business for the benefit of law No. 08/07/2015 and No. 45799 of the Supreme Court of Public Prosecutor’s Office on October 16/09/2015 and the PUK. it was read by giving it to the apartment with the notification No. 2015-256929.
In the above-mentioned notice;
According to the scope of the file, Muteriz was informed about the fact that the windows of the vehicle he was driving were filmed due to Article 30/1-b of the Law No. 2918 “..those who use vehicles with decorative accessories and protrusions that interfere with vision or may be dangerous to those inside in the event of an accident … are punished with an administrative fine.” although administrative sanctions have been applied in accordance with the regulation, no determination has been made in the administrative sanctions minutes that the aforementioned films block the view, nor has it been ignored in the report on this, however, even when viewed with the naked eye in the photos of the vehicle presented to the file by muteriz, 309 of the Criminal Procedure Code No. 5271 on the grounds that there was no hit in the decision to reject the appeal in writing instead of accepting it, in the face of the understanding that the films in question did not block the view. it was discussed and considered necessary to request that the decision referred to in accordance with the article be overturned in the interests of the law;
Prompt reversal of the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Supreme Court in favor of the law based on the contents of the notice are observed in because blameworthy about 11/04/2015 date, and HF-4553 administrative sanctions… the serial number given in writing to the magistrates ‘ Bench, dated the decision of the CPC of different business 24/04/2015 2015/45 309/4. according to the article, it was unanimously decided on 22.06.2016 to cancel the administrative fine for traffic with the serial number HF-4553 dated 11/04/2015 on misdemeanor … and to cancel the administrative fine for traffic with the serial number HF-4553 … on 22.06.2016.
You can read our other articles and petition examples by clicking here