12. Legal Department 2021/1454 E. , 2021/1915 K.
“Text Of Jurisprudence”
349 of the Enforcement and Bankruptcy Code of 2004 with a bet that the complainant or his attorney of the case against the defendant Nurcan Morgil for violating the borrower’s payment requirement did not attend the hearing without giving an excuse. 17 be lowered in compliance. Regarding the rejection of the appeal against the decision of the Executive Criminal Court dated 10/03/2020 and based on 2019/743, No. 2020/116 … 18. The case file attached to the letter containing the request of the Ministry of Defense to overturn the decision dated 17/07/2020 and numbered 2020/31 October 08/12/2020 and for the benefit of law 94660652-105-34-17449-2020-Pub dated 17/07/2020 and numbered 2020/31 is the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Court on 18/01/2021 day and PUK- it was read by sending it to our apartment with notification No. 2021/2686.
In the above-mentioned notice;
According to the scope of the file, although … 17. According to the decision of the Executive Criminal Court dated 10/03/2020, although the client’s deputy was informed of the day and time of the hearing, it was decided to drop the case on the grounds that he did not attend the hearing without giving an excuse; Dated 10/03/2020 trial record suggests the time of the hearing in question 12:50, which opened at the complainants to file a petition against the aforementioned decision of the appeal of attorney, it offers an excuse to petition drawn by the annex at 12:48 of attorney presented to the court in taking the liberty of adding a document from the portal, without considering where the customer has a valid excuse of attorney, appeals the denial must be in writing instead of in deciding whether the adoption of a code of Criminal Procedure No. 5271 309 on the grounds that it did not have a hit. it was discussed and considered necessary to request that the decision referred to in accordance with the article be overturned in the interests of the law;
Since the contents of the notice based on the request of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Supreme Court to overturn it for the benefit of the law were seen on the spot … 18. It was unanimously decided on 23/02/2021 that the decision of the Executive Criminal Court dated 17/07/2020 and numbered 2020/31 was OVERTURNED in order not to affect and not to hold a retrial in accordance with Article 309/4-c of the CMK.
You can read our other articles and petition examples by clicking here