Anasayfa » Blog » Conversion Of A Participatory Property Into A Shared Property

Conversion Of A Participatory Property Into A Shared Property

Conversion Of A Participatory Property Into A Shared Property

Joint Ownership

Article 701 of the Civil Code defines joint ownership as those who jointly own the goods due to the community formed in accordance with the law or the agreements stipulated in the law. As a continuation article, the form of management of joint ownership is determined with the statement that “in joint ownership, the partners do not have determined shares, and the right of each of them is common to all of the goods entering into the partnership”. These issues should be taken into consideration in the conversion of joint ownership into shared ownership.

Our Civil Code has categorised the establishment of unity partnership in 3 groups: general property partnership, family property partnership, ordinary partnership from the husband and wife property regime. Unlike all of these forms of establishment, in case of management, there is no share that the partners can save on their shares. Only in case of liquidation, the partners share their shares. As a matter of fact, unless otherwise agreed or unless a representative is appointed, the shareholders must decide unanimously for both management and savings transactions.

Cases of Termination

Unanimous ownership is terminated by the transfer of the property, dissolution of the community or conversion to shared ownership. Pursuant to Article 703, it is possible to terminate the partnership in the event of the transfer of the property to another person by unanimous consent, or by the conversion of the property into shared ownership by consent. The right of a partner other than the inheritance partnership to sue for the conversion of unanimous ownership into shared ownership is not regulated.

In practice, the reflections of joint ownership require the partnership to act together for the estate/property/partnership in any case, and does not authorise a partner to dispose of the property separately. As a matter of fact, the most common issue in practice and the subject of our article is about the management of the partnership regarding the money inherited by inheritance and deposited in the bank or the money of the heir in the bank.

Allocation of the heir’s money in the bank to the partners

In Article 640 of the Civil Code, it is stated that upon the death of the heir, a partnership will be formed between the heirs covering all rights and debts in the inheritance until the sharing, and that the heirs will own the inheritance unanimously. As a matter of fact, it is not possible for the heir who has a share in the liquidation of the money inherited by inheritance or in the possession of the heir to apply to the bank and claim his/her share. Nowadays, many citizens are faced with the fact that the money is not paid even if they apply to the banks where the money is located in order to pay the relevant share to their ownership. For this reason, since the shares of the partners in joint ownership are accepted to be common to the rights of each of them, in accordance with the mandatory provision of the Civil Code 640, either a representative must be appointed to the partnership or the partnership must be converted into shared ownership in order for the shareholders to gain the authority to dispose of the property on their own or for the price to be divided separately by the shareholders.

In addition to the foregoing, the General Assembly of the Court of Cassation, with its decision numbered 2006/19-552 E, 2006/589 K., emphasised that the shares of the estate in the inheritance partnership belong to the partnership without separation and that the heirs do not have independent shares in the continuation of the partnership, and stated that in order to pay the money in the bank, only the heirs who have a share in the estate should apply to the bank together or appoint a representative or the partnership should be converted to shared ownership. On the other hand, it is undoubtedly that converting the joint ownership into a shared ownership and opening the way for the shareholders to save in proportion to their shares will provide convenience in terms of implementation. Otherwise, the bank will not fulfil the request if the bank is applied to the bank with joint ownership.

 

You can access our other article examples and petition examples by clicking 

 

Bir yanıt yazın

E-posta adresiniz yayınlanmayacak. Gerekli alanlar * ile işaretlenmişlerdir