TO THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
PLAYER:TO THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
PLAYER:
ATTORNEY:
DEFENDANT:
SUBJECT OF THE CASE: It is a land registry registration case (…… TL).
EVENTS : 1- The plaintiff client, the deed ….. island, ……. he O THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
PLAYER:
ATTORNEY:
DEFENDANT:
SUBJECT OF THE CASE: It is a land registry registration case (…… TL).
EVENTS : 1- The plaintiff client, the deed ….. island, ……. he is the owner of the real estate registeO THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
PLAYER:
ATTORNEY:
DEFENDANT:
SUBJECT OF THE CASE: It is a land registry registration case (…… TL).
EVENTS : 1- The plaintiff client, the deed ….. island, ……. he is the owner of the real estate registered in the parcel number. The defendant is also the owner of the immovable property adjacent to the plaintiff’s land.
2- While the plaintiff client was constructing a building on his own land, he used part of the defendant’s land without realizing it, not intentionally. This issue arose after the defendant objected after the construction was completed and made a boundary determination for science proficiency.
3- Since there has been no fixed border between the properties belonging to the parties for years, the plaintiff has unwittingly encroached on the neighboring parcel. However, the value of the building is much higher than the value of the encroached part- Since there has been no fixed border between the properties belonging to the parties for years, the plaintiff has unwittingly encroached on the neighboring parcel. However, the value of the building is much higher than the value of the encroached part. Just as the demolition of the construction would not be in accordance with fairness, it is too much more than the value of the encroached part. Just as the demolition of the construction will not be in accordance with justice, the abandonment of the violated part will not prevent the defendant from using his real estate.
4- For this reason, we demand that the ownership of the part of the defendant’s real estate, where the encroaching part of the construction is installed, be given to the plaintiff for an appropriate price.
LEGAL REASONS4- For this reason, we demand that the ownership of the part of the defendant’s real estate, where the encr4- For this reason, we demand that the ownership of the part of the defendant’s real estate, where the encroaching part of the construction is installed, be given to the plaintiff for an appropriate price.
LEGAL REASONS :
EVIDENCE: Land registry record, discovery, expert examination, witness statement and all- For this reason, we demand that the ownership of the part of the defendant’s real esta